UCI

2002 PPIC Statewide Survey: December 2002
Special Survey of Orange County
Public Policy Institute of California
in collaboration with the
University of California, Irvine

Press Release
Survey Methodology
Home

County Conditions
Most Important Problem
Regional Problems
Local Public Services
Local Government Ratings
Resident Satisfaction
Quality of Life

Public Policy
Infrastructure
Surface Transportation
Priorities and Funding
 
Funding Transportation Projects Through Local Sales Tax 
Measure M Sales Tax
The Great Park

Economic and Political Trends
Consumer Confidence
County Economy
Real Estate Market
Personal Finance
Economic Inequality
Approval Ratings of the Governor
Approval Ratings of the President

Appendices
2002 Survey
Survey Advisory Commitee

University of California, Irvine
© 2002 UC Regents

Economic Inequality

Recent demographic reports have focused attention on the income trends of the poor and the wealthy in the state today. Nearly six in 10 Orange County residents believe that California is divided into economic groups – the haves and have-nots. Thirty-seven percent do not believe this is the case. The percentage of county residents who perceive this division is nearly identical to the 61 percent of all Californians who reported this perception in the September 2002 Statewide Survey.

Majorities of Orange County residents of all racial/ethnic groups, ages, educational attainment, and levels of income believe that the state is divided into economic groups. There are no differences in this perception between Latinos and whites, North and South County residents, and homeowners and renters. However, there are strong partisan and political differences: 66 percent of Democrats compared to 51 percent of Republicans, and 71 percent of liberals compared to 49 percent of conservatives, believe that the state is divided into economic groups.

"Some people think that California is divided into economic groups – the haves and have-nots – while others think it is not divided that way. Do you think that California is divided into haves and have-nots, or do you think that California is not divided that way?"

   

Annual Household Income

Race / Ethnicity

All Adults

<$40K

$40,000-
79,999

$80K+

White

Latino

Divided into haves and have-nots

59%

62%

62%

56%

60%

58%

Not divided that way

37

34

34

41

38

37

Don’t know

4

4

4

3

2

5


When asked if they thought of themselves as in the have or have-not group, two in three Orange County residents considered themselves to be in the have group, and one in four thought they were among the have-nots. In the September 2002 PPIC Statewide Survey, 60 percent of Californians described themselves as haves, and 32 percent said they were among the have-nots.

Responses to this question revealed a wide racial/ethnic gap: 75 percent of whites think of themselves as in the have group, while 51 percent of Latinos consider themselves to be have-nots. Nearly nine in 10 residents (87%) with annual household incomes of $80,000 or more rank themselves among the haves, compared to only 38 percent of those with incomes under $40,000. Homeowners and renters also have sharply different views when it comes to placing themselves in the have group (76% to 46%). Residents’ perceptions of being have-nots declines with age (36% of those under age 35 versus 15% of those age 55 and older) and education (47% of those with no college versus 14% of college graduates). South County residents are more likely than North County residents (73% to 61%) to consider themselves in the have group.

"If you had to choose, which of these groups are you in – the haves or the have-nots?"

   

Annual Household Income

Race / Ethnicity

All Adults

<$40K

$40,000 -
79,999

$80K +

White

Latino

Haves

65%

38%

69%

87%

75%

39%

Have-nots

27

54

23

7

17

51

Don’t know

8

8

8

6

8

10