UCI

2001 PPIC Statewide Survey: September 2001
Special Survey of Orange County
Public Policy Institute of California
in collaboration with the
University of California, Irvine

Executive Summary
Press Release
Press Release on El Toro
Survey Methodology

Home

Local Perceptions
Local Population Growth
Residential Satisfaction
Local Public Service Ratings

County Regional Issues
County Regional Problems
Causes of County Regional Problems
Preparing for Regional Growth

Orange County Issues
Most Important Issue
The County's Population Growth
The Consequences
El Toro Airport
Traffic and Transportation
County Government

Economic and Political Trends
Consumer Confidence
Overall Mood
Real Estate Market
Governor's Approval Ratings
President's Approval Ratings
Computers and the Internet

Appendices
2001 Survey
Survey Advisory Commitee

University of California, Irvine
© 2001 UC Regents

Local Public Service Ratings

Residents of Orange County give their public services ratings as high as residents did in the early 1980s, indicating once again how little growth seems to have affected perceived quality of life. When the excellent and good rankings are combined, residents today are about as likely as they were in 1982 to give positive ratings to local roads (68% to 72%) and local parks and beaches (81% to 82%) and more likely to give positive ratings to local police protection (82% to 76%) and local public schools (61% to 45%).

Moreover, positive ratings of local services have improved dramatically over the ratings in 1991: Excellent or good ratings are at least 10 points higher for local roads (68% to 58%), local parks and beaches (81% to 71%), local police (82% to 59%), and local public schools (61% to 28%).

 

"How would you rate some of the public services
in your local area - are they excellent, good, fair, or poor?"

All Adults

1982

1991

2001

Local police protection

   

Excellent/Good


76%

59%


82%

Fair


16

28


11

Poor


4

9


3

Don't know


4

4


4

Local parks, beaches, and other public recreational facilities

   

Excellent/Good


82%

71%


81%

Fair


10

18


13

Poor


2

8


4

Don't know


6

3


2

Local freeways, streets, and roads

   

Excellent/Good


72%

58%


68%

Fair


21

32


22

Poor


6

9


10

Don't know


1

1


0

Local public schools

   

Excellent/Good


45%

28%


61%

Fair


14

28


12

Poor


8

27


6

Don't know


33

17


21

1982 and 1991 results are from the Orange County Annual Survey, UCI, by Mark Baldassare and Cheryl Katz.

 

There are no differences across racial and ethnic groups in the proportion of excellent or good ratings given to local roads. However, non-Hispanic whites are more positive than others about local parks and local police, and Asians and Latinos are more positive than non-Hispanic whites about local public schools.

The ratings of public services do vary across regions: South County residents are consistently more positive than North County residents about local roads (79% to 63%), local parks and beaches (89% to 78%), local police (87% to 80%), and local public schools (68% to 58%).

Higher-income residents are more positive than others about local police, parks, and schools. Residents with children in the public schools give their local schools higher ratings than others do (78% to 52%).

 

"How would you rate some of the public services
in your local area - are they excellent, good, fair, or poor?"

Race/Ethnicity

Asian

Latino

White

Local police protection

     

Excellent/Good


76%

76%


86%

Fair


17

17


8

Poor


2

4


2

Don't know


5

3


4

Local parks, beaches, and other public recreational facilities

     

Excellent/Good


75%

76%


83%

Fair


18

15


11

Poor


5

6


3

Don't know


2

3


3

Local freeways, streets, and roads

     

Excellent/Good


68%

68%


67%

Fair


21

20


23

Poor


11

12


9

Don't know


0

0


1

Local public schools

     

Excellent/Good


62%

69%


59%

Fair


13

12


12

Poor


4

5


5

Don't know


21

14


24