UCI

2001 PPIC Statewide Survey: September 2001
Special Survey of Orange County
Public Policy Institute of California
in collaboration with the
University of California, Irvine

Executive Summary
Press Release
Press Release on El Toro
Survey Methodology

Home

Local Perceptions
Local Population Growth
Residential Satisfaction
Local Public Service Ratings

County Regional Issues
County Regional Problems
Causes of County Regional Problems
Preparing for Regional Growth

Orange County Issues
Most Important Issue
The County's Population Growth
The Consequences
El Toro Airport
Traffic and Transportation
County Government

Economic and Political Trends
Consumer Confidence
Overall Mood
Real Estate Market
Governor's Approval Ratings
President's Approval Ratings
Computers and the Internet

Appendices
2001 Survey
Survey Advisory Commitee

University of California, Irvine
© 2001 UC Regents

Local Population Growth

Orange County has grown rapidly since the early 1980s, and most of its residents are very aware of this. For the most part, however, they believe their local governments are doing enough to accommodate the growth.

Sixty-five percent of residents think the population has grown rapidly in their cities and communities, and another 21 percent believe their local areas have experienced slow growth. Only 14 percent say the local population is unchanged, and no one thought it had declined. Perceptions of rapid growth were about the same as in the 1991 Orange County survey but were greater than in 1982, the year of the first Orange County Annual Survey at the University of California, Irvine. These perceptions did not vary across racial/ethnic groups or by age, income, or education. However, the perception of rapid population growth was higher in the South County (73%) than in the North County (62%).

Given the high percentage of people who believe their areas are growing rapidly, it is rather surprising to find that two in three residents also believe that government regulations aimed at controlling growth are either about right (55%) or actually too strict (9%). Only about one-third think their local growth regulations are not strict enough. These attitudes mirror those in the 1982 survey but differ considerably from attitudes in 1991. At that time, residents were much less likely to believe that growth regulations were about right, and much more likely to believe they were not strict enough.

There were no differences across regions or political party lines in the belief that local efforts to control growth are about right. Older, higher income, and college-educated residents were somewhat more likely than others to believe that local growth controls were not strict enough. Attitudes toward controls also differed by race and ethnicity: Non-Hispanic whites (40%) are much more likely than Latinos (25%) and Asians (26%) to believe that local growth controls are not strict enough. Even among those who perceive rapid growth, fewer than half (46%) say that local growth controls in their cities and communities are not strict enough.

All Adults

1982

1991

2001

In the past few years, do you think the
population of your city or community
has been growing rapidly, growing slowly, staying about the same, or declining?

     

Growing rapidly


57%

64%


65%

Growing slowly


23

18


21

Staying about the same


19

17


14

Declining


1

1


0

Do you think that the government
regulations aimed at controlling growth
in your city or community are too strict,
about right, or not strict enough?

   

Too strict


9%

7%


9%

About right


51

36


55

Not strict enough


40

57


36

1982 and 1991 results are from the Orange County Annual Survey, UCI, by Mark Baldassare and Cheryl Katz.