UCI

1998 Orange County Annual Survey
University of California, Irvine

Home
News Releases

Executive Summary

Overall Mood
Quality of Life
Local Government
El Toro Airport
Public Schools
Consumer Confidence
Most Important Problem
Housing Market
Transportation
Charitable Attitudes
Political Climate
Conclusions
Survey Questions
About the Survey

University of California, Irvine
© 1998 UC Regents

Quality of Life

Orange County does not appear to be losing its luster as a result of urbanization. In ratings of happiness with their personal circumstances and satisfaction with their region, Orange County residents are much more upbeat than are Los Angeles County residents. Trends over time in Orange County also are favorable. More than half of Orange County residents say they are very satisfied with their house, job and leisure-time pursuits, while a quarter are very satisfied with their current financial situation. In each of these quality-of-life ratings, Orange County has more than a 10-point edge over Los Angeles County. And when asked to assess their overall happiness, people in Orange County are considerably more likely than those in Los Angeles County to say they are very happy (36% vs. 26%).
Graph: Personal Satistfaction
(Percent very satisfied)

Non-Hispanic whites in Orange County are more likely than Latinos and Asians to express a great deal of satisfaction with their housing (64% vs. 47% vs. 50%), jobs (60% vs. 49% vs. 37%), leisure (59% vs. 48% vs. 43%) and finances (30% vs. 25% vs. 23%). Non-Hispanic whites are also somewhat more likely to say they are very happy with their lives (38% vs. 30% vs. 34%). One in three Orange County residents is very satisfied with job opportunities in this region, compared with one in five in Los Angeles County. However, residents in the two areas give similarly low ratings to the availability of housing they can afford and the overall cost of living in the region.
Graph: Satisfaction with Region
(Percent very satisfied)

Non-Hispanic whites in Orange County are more likely than Latinos and Asians to say they are very satisfied with their region's job opportunities (38% vs. 20% vs. 29%). However, evaluations of housing availability and local cost of living are similar among the three groups. A quarter of Orange County residents say their region has big problems with traffic and growth, while only one in five says that air, water and environmental problems are big concerns. Los Angeles County residents are much more likely than Orange County residents to say they have major problems with traffic congestion and pollution of all kinds. Both regions are equally likely to say that growth and development is a major concern.
Graph: Perceptions of Regional Problems
(Percent saying this is a big problem)


Non-Hispanic whites in Orange County are a little more likely than Latinos and Asians to say that traffic (28% vs. 20% vs. 22%) and growth (28% vs. 21% vs. 21%) are big problems, but there are no differences in concerns about air, water and environmental pollution. We explored the possibility that the differences between the two counties reflect the fact that Los Angeles County has a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic whites and that Orange County has a larger percentage of affluent residents. We find that Orange County still outscores Los Angeles County when comparing non-Hispanic whites and those earning less than $80,000 a year in each county. There also is little evidence that Orange County's quality of life is in decline over time. Comparing the 1991 and 1998 surveys, the numbers who are very satisfied with their housing (56% vs. 58%), work (39% vs. 55%), finances (20% vs. 28%) and happiness (27% vs. 36%) are either unchanged or improved. Looking back to 1982, we see declines in evaluations of housing (67% to 58%) and leisure (68% to 54%), but not in work (47% vs. 55%), finances (31% vs. 28%) or overall happiness (34% vs. 36%).