UCI

1994 Orange County Annual Survey
University of California, Irvine

Executive Summary
Introduction
Survey Methodology

Home

Jobs and the Economy
The Orange County Economy
El Toro Marine Base
Consumer Confidence

Crime
Most Important Problems
Crime Perceptions
Crime and Public Policy

Tracking Questions
County Perceptions
Transportation
Growth and Development
The Environment
Housing
Charitable Giving
Political Climate

Conclusions

Appendices
Participants
1994 Survey

University of California, Irvine
© 1994 UC Regents

Survey Methodology

The Orange County Annual Survey, UCI was co-directed by Mark Baldassare, professor and chair of urban and regional planning, and Cheryl Katz, research associate. The random telephone survey included interviews with 1,000 Orange County adult residents conducted August 19 to 29, 1994.

Interviewing was conducted on weekend days and weekday nights, using a computer-generated random sample of telephone numbers. Within a household, adult respondents were randomly chosen for interview. Each interview included 94 questions and took an average of 20 minutes to complete. The interviewing was conducted in English and Spanish, as needed.

The completion rate for the survey was 61 percent. This rate is consistent with earlier Orange County Annual Surveys. Of the telephone numbers called, 20 percent resulted in completed interviews and 13 percent were refusals. The field work was conducted by Interviewing Services of America of Van Nuys, CA.

The sample was compared to the 1990 U.S. Census population figures by city for Orange County and was found to represent the actual regional distribution of Orange County residents. The sample's demographic characteristics were also closely comparable to the Census and other data available on Orange County residents.

The sampling error for this survey is +/- 3 percent at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that 95 times out of 100, the results will be within 3 percentage points of what they would be if all adults in Orange County were interviewed. The sampling error for any subgroup would be larger. Sampling error is just one type of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by question wording, ordering, and survey timing.